#acl All:
,1 JohnPitt 2007-09-24 17:13:01 Tony et al, I made changes to my PDF generation for 9.2 using the previous iteration of this article. The changes were applied to the stationery for 4 separate clients. I'm about to upgrade each of these stationery sets to 9.3 (and I am moving from using ePP to ePX for generation). When I diff the various filesets, how should I handle the PDF changes made for 9.2? Ignore them? Delete them? jjj
,1 TonyMcDow 2007-09-24 18:02:48 John, we will either post an update to this article for 9.3 formats or make it part of the built-in PDF format in the next patch release or both. For now, here are some options: (1) Try the new PDF generation to see if it meets your needs, however there are still a few FrameMaker symbol fonts not coming through. We are hoping this problem will go away in FrameMaker 8. (2) Create a 9.2.2 stand-alone stationery for use with 9.3, and keep current PDF handling (good option if generating only PDF and you are statisfied with the current PDF link processing).
,1 ms1-2 2007-09-26 12:58:04 These instructions are blatantly wrong. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! If you follow them you will NOT be able to generate PDFs using Distiller. Instead, the instructions should NOT read "place this block of code between" but REPLACE THIS BLOCK OF CODE WITH THE BLOCK OF CODE SHOWN HERE! One more example of how Quadralay can't seem to document their own application.
,1 JohnPitt 2007-09-26 17:44:58 Thx Tony -- My PDFs never quite worked properly, so when time permits I will migrate all to 9.3 and remove the PDF code I added. But your point on making 9.2.2 stationery is well taken. jjj